90NinetyIQ
Back

Rank 18 · 2026 race

Jude Bellingham

Real Madrid · England · Midfielder

Real-data provisional ranking

Every displayed component is computed from current API-Football fixture, event, player-stat, standings, and pre-match Elo evidence, plus dated official-source individual award records. The locked 2024–2025 vote-forecast holdout is complete but failed its publication thresholds; its experimental ranking is disclosed separately from football merit.

As of 2026-07-31
66.9

#18 in the index

No change since the previous snapshot

Individual37.8 / 55
Decisive21.9 / 25
Team7.2 / 20

Explanation

Jude Bellingham: score 66.9. Match-swinging contribution is the strongestComponent; Individual accolades is the limitingComponent. Very strong match-swinging and team credit sit alongside zero official accolade points.

Why the rank moved

The rank is unchanged at #18. No causal movement claim is made without a prior component decomposition.

Vote forecast context

Football case vs. vote environment.

This research layer estimates visibility and recognition around the journalist ballot. It never changes the player’s 100-point football merit score.

Pre-shortlist watchlist · as of August 18, 2026

Context

12.8 / 30

Vote forecast

41.5

forecast rank #21

Decisive trophy narrative

3.7 / 10

Decisive trophy narrative contributes 3.7 of 10.0 context points: A sourced forecast feature for the biggest team achievement and the player's prominence in that achievement. It deliberately models revealed ballot behavior and never changes football merit.

Empirical position prior

2.6 / 4

Empirical position prior contributes 2.6 of 4.0 context points: A regime-aware coefficient learned from historical voting residuals, never applied to the position-neutral football merit score.

Club & league visibility

4.0 / 4

Club & league visibility contributes 4.0 of 4.0 context points: A historical ballot-visibility prior estimated after controlling for merit, position, and achievements; it is distinct from team quality and competition strength.

Recognition & aura

1.9 / 5

Recognition & aura contributes 1.9 of 5.0 context points: Time-decayed prior Ballon d'Or shortlist, top-ten, podium, and voting recognition; no manual reputation score, follower count, or subjective vibes.

Media momentum

0.6 / 7

Media momentum contributes 0.6 of 7.0 context points: Source-weighted prominence, headline placement, positive candidacy framing, geographic breadth, and recency in audited football journalism; paid promotion, club PR, duplicate stories, and raw social volume are excluded.

The completed historical calibration is published as a failed-holdout experiment: 5% merit, 25% individual output, 20% defensive trophy residual, and 50% jury context produced mean holdout Spearman rho 0.518, below the 0.700 publication threshold. It is available for analysis, not validated. The LLM never supplies a hidden weight. Prediction markets remain an external benchmark, and the LLM cannot add points or move a player. Next scheduled refresh: Oct 12, 2026.

Audited intelligence

Logic and nuance, without hidden points.

Watchlist status with a market-narrative note; market context unavailable.

limited

Shortlist

Watchlist noted in the supplied research source; this is not the official shortlist.

Prediction markets

Market context unavailable.

Watchlist status recorded for Jude Bellingham.[ninetyiq-watchlist-2026-08-12]
L'Équipe presents this candidate with neutral framing in body placement; this is vote-context evidence, not football merit.[lequipe-2026-07-20-3772900710]

Uncertainty

No market evidence was supplied.

openai/gpt-5.4-mini · ballon-index-explanation-v0.3.2

Score waterfall

Base → ten components → 66.9

Each bar adds its published contribution. The final bar must equal the exact sum of the components or the build fails.

Full decomposition

Every point, in one sentence.

100% data coverage

Role output

Role output is the 87th role-cohort percentile from 4 disclosed metric families (100% weight coverage).

How this was calculated

weighted mean of position-specific metric percentiles; raw action rates use frozen pre-match field-strength adjustment and ratios use empirical-Bayes shrinkage

Source: API-Football embedded player-fixture statistics

Evidence: 46 observations · 100% coverage

key passes per 90

1.844

assists per 90

0.19

accurate passes per 90

48.389

assists

6.689

API-Football opaque player ratings are excluded.

Rates and totals are compared only within the same position.

Positive actions receive a disclosed 0.85–1.15 field-strength scalar derived from frozen pre-match Elo.

13.1 / 15

Creation & progression

Creation & progression is the 86th role-cohort percentile from 4 disclosed metric families (100% weight coverage).

How this was calculated

weighted mean of position-specific metric percentiles; raw action rates use frozen pre-match field-strength adjustment and ratios use empirical-Bayes shrinkage

Source: API-Football embedded player-fixture statistics

Evidence: 46 observations · 100% coverage

key passes per 90

1.844

accurate passes per 90

48.389

assists per 90

0.19

successful dribbles per 90

2.209

API-Football opaque player ratings are excluded.

Rates and totals are compared only within the same position.

Positive actions receive a disclosed 0.85–1.15 field-strength scalar derived from frozen pre-match Elo.

8.6 / 10

All-round role contribution

All-round role contribution is the 84th role-cohort percentile from 4 disclosed metric families (100% weight coverage).

How this was calculated

weighted mean of position-specific metric percentiles; raw action rates use frozen pre-match field-strength adjustment and ratios use empirical-Bayes shrinkage

Source: API-Football embedded player-fixture statistics

Evidence: 46 observations · 100% coverage

tackles per 90

2.714

interceptions per 90

0.736

duels won per 90

9.148

duel success

0.562

API-Football opaque player ratings are excluded.

Rates and totals are compared only within the same position.

Positive actions receive a disclosed 0.85–1.15 field-strength scalar derived from frozen pre-match Elo.

6.7 / 8

Efficiency & execution

Efficiency & execution is the 90th role-cohort percentile from 4 disclosed metric families (100% weight coverage).

How this was calculated

weighted mean of position-specific metric percentiles; raw action rates use frozen pre-match field-strength adjustment and ratios use empirical-Bayes shrinkage

Source: API-Football embedded player-fixture statistics

Evidence: 46 observations · 100% coverage

pass completion

0.881

duel success

0.562

dribble success

0.578

shot accuracy

0.67

API-Football opaque player ratings are excluded.

Rates and totals are compared only within the same position.

Positive actions receive a disclosed 0.85–1.15 field-strength scalar derived from frozen pre-match Elo.

6.3 / 7

Availability & consistency

Availability combines 3166 minutes (56% of team opportunity), 46 appearances, and 76% smooth consistency credit.

How this was calculated

60% minutes share + 15% appearance share + 10% start share + 15% smooth 30+ minute match-impact consistency

Source: API-Football fixture participation and team schedules

Evidence: 46 observations · 100% coverage

minutes

3166 minutes

minutes share

0.564

appearance share

0.742

consistency share

0.756

Opportunity is calculated within each represented team-season-competition.

Consistency uses unshrunk match impact and a smooth 0.40–0.60 credit curve instead of a noisy hard threshold.

3.1 / 5

Individual accolades

No qualifying individual accolade is recorded for this player in the audited official-source snapshot; 0.0 of 10.0.

How this was calculated

published direct award points; sum within competition tier, apply the tier cap, sum tiers, then apply the 10-point component cap

Source: Official FIFA, confederation, UEFA, league, and players-union award records

Evidence: 0 observations · 100% coverage

Uncapped direct points: 0.00.

Tier credits after overlap caps: none.

Final accolade component: 0.00/10.0.

An absent official award is scored as zero; the LLM cannot add or alter honors.

0.0 / 10

Strong-opposition performance

Against opponents at or above the 75th pre-match Elo percentile: 16 appearances, 1306 minutes, and 57th role-impact percentile.

How this was calculated

85% minutes-weighted role impact + 15% capped 900-minute volume

Source: API-Football player-fixture statistics plus NinetyIQ leak-free pre-match Elo

Evidence: 16 observations · 100% coverage

strong-opposition matches

16

minutes

1306 minutes

mean role impact

0.569

Opponent strength is frozen before kickoff.

API-Football opaque player ratings are excluded.

3.2 / 5

Knockout & final impact

Knockout credit combines 4.95 event-leverage units from 4 goal/assist/penalty events with 7 appearances and 525 minutes.

How this was calculated

70% stage- and prestige-weighted event leverage + 25% stage-, prestige-, and minutes-weighted role impact + 5% capped 900-minute prestige volume

Source: API-Football event timelines and player-fixture statistics plus NinetyIQ leak-free pre-match Elo

Evidence: 7 observations · 100% coverage

knockout matches

7

minutes

525 minutes

knockout event leverage

4.954

mean role impact

0.495

Knockout minutes contribute only 5% of this signal.

Event leverage is adjusted for score state, match clock, knockout stage, competition prestige, and opponent strength.

API-Football opaque player ratings are excluded.

6.9 / 8

Match-swinging contribution

Match-state events produce 12.90 leverage units from 21 goal/assist/penalty events; the score uses verified event leverage without a generalized role-output proxy.

How this was calculated

100% expected-points-added goal/assist leverage (65% volume, 35% rate); generalized role output receives no match-swing credit

Source: API-Football event timelines and player-fixture statistics

Evidence: 21 observations · 100% coverage

event leverage

12.896

score-changing event actions

21

Goal leverage is the change in expected points from frozen pre-match Elo, live score, and match clock.

Untimed generalized role actions are excluded from this component.

11.8 / 12

Team performance & achievements

Team credit: FIFA World Cup semi final (0.55 credit); La Liga runner up (0.21 credit); UEFA Champions League quarter final (0.17 credit). Diminishing-return evidence is 0.72 against the disclosed 2.00 ceiling.

How this was calculated

finish × prestige × route × participation × importance; credits then receive 1.0/0.6/0.3/0.1 diminishing weights

Source: API-Football standings, tournament results, player minutes, role impact, and pre-match Elo

Evidence: 4 observations · 100% coverage

FIFA World Cup

0.548

La Liga

0.208

UEFA Champions League

0.165

Copa del Rey

0.005

Evidence is normalized to a 2.00 ceiling.

Team success is not awarded equally to every squad member.

Starting semi-finals and finals increases importance; bench status therefore reduces trophy credit.

7.2 / 20