90NinetyIQ
Back

Rank 06 · 2026 race

Désiré Doué

Paris Saint Germain · France · Forward

Real-data provisional ranking

Every displayed component is computed from current API-Football fixture, event, player-stat, standings, and pre-match Elo evidence, plus dated official-source individual award records. The locked 2024–2025 vote-forecast holdout is complete but failed its publication thresholds; its experimental ranking is disclosed separately from football merit.

As of 2026-07-31
73.1

#6 in the index

No change since the previous snapshot

Individual37.2 / 55
Decisive21.5 / 25
Team14.4 / 20

Explanation

Désiré Doué ranks 6 on 73.1; strongestComponent Match-swinging contribution, limitingComponent Individual accolades. Big match leverage, creation, and role output drive the score, while the audited official-source accolade snapshot is empty.

Why the rank moved

The rank is unchanged at #6. No causal movement claim is made without a prior component decomposition.

Vote forecast context

Football case vs. vote environment.

This research layer estimates visibility and recognition around the journalist ballot. It never changes the player’s 100-point football merit score.

Pre-shortlist watchlist · as of August 18, 2026

Context

14.2 / 30

Vote forecast

44.1

forecast rank #13

Decisive trophy narrative

5.7 / 10

Decisive trophy narrative contributes 5.7 of 10.0 context points: A sourced forecast feature for the biggest team achievement and the player's prominence in that achievement. It deliberately models revealed ballot behavior and never changes football merit.

Empirical position prior

4.0 / 4

Empirical position prior contributes 4.0 of 4.0 context points: A regime-aware coefficient learned from historical voting residuals, never applied to the position-neutral football merit score.

Club & league visibility

4.0 / 4

Club & league visibility contributes 4.0 of 4.0 context points: A historical ballot-visibility prior estimated after controlling for merit, position, and achievements; it is distinct from team quality and competition strength.

Recognition & aura

0.5 / 5

Recognition & aura contributes 0.5 of 5.0 context points: Time-decayed prior Ballon d'Or shortlist, top-ten, podium, and voting recognition; no manual reputation score, follower count, or subjective vibes.

Media momentum

0.0 / 7

Media momentum contributes 0.0 of 7.0 context points: Source-weighted prominence, headline placement, positive candidacy framing, geographic breadth, and recency in audited football journalism; paid promotion, club PR, duplicate stories, and raw social volume are excluded.

The completed historical calibration is published as a failed-holdout experiment: 5% merit, 25% individual output, 20% defensive trophy residual, and 50% jury context produced mean holdout Spearman rho 0.518, below the 0.700 publication threshold. It is available for analysis, not validated. The LLM never supplies a hidden weight. Prediction markets remain an external benchmark, and the LLM cannot add points or move a player. Next scheduled refresh: Oct 12, 2026.

Audited intelligence

Logic and nuance, without hidden points.

Watchlist status is available; market context is unavailable.

limited

Shortlist

Watchlist status available for this player; this is not the official shortlist.

Prediction markets

Market context unavailable.

Player appears in the NinetyIQ pre-shortlist merit watchlist.[ninetyiq-watchlist-2026-08-12]

Uncertainty

No market evidence was supplied; external award snapshot shows no qualifying individual accolade.

openai/gpt-5.4-mini · ballon-index-explanation-v0.3.2

Score waterfall

Base → ten components → 73.1

Each bar adds its published contribution. The final bar must equal the exact sum of the components or the build fails.

Full decomposition

Every point, in one sentence.

100% data coverage

Role output

Role output is the 89th role-cohort percentile from 4 disclosed metric families (100% weight coverage).

How this was calculated

weighted mean of position-specific metric percentiles; raw action rates use frozen pre-match field-strength adjustment and ratios use empirical-Bayes shrinkage

Source: API-Football embedded player-fixture statistics

Evidence: 46 observations · 100% coverage

non-penalty goals per 90

0.465

non-penalty goals

14

assists per 90

0.342

assists

10.309

API-Football opaque player ratings are excluded.

Rates and totals are compared only within the same position.

Positive actions receive a disclosed 0.85–1.15 field-strength scalar derived from frozen pre-match Elo.

13.3 / 15

Creation & progression

Creation & progression is the 95th role-cohort percentile from 4 disclosed metric families (100% weight coverage).

How this was calculated

weighted mean of position-specific metric percentiles; raw action rates use frozen pre-match field-strength adjustment and ratios use empirical-Bayes shrinkage

Source: API-Football embedded player-fixture statistics

Evidence: 46 observations · 100% coverage

key passes per 90

2.932

successful dribbles per 90

2.6

assists per 90

0.342

accurate passes per 90

51.841

API-Football opaque player ratings are excluded.

Rates and totals are compared only within the same position.

Positive actions receive a disclosed 0.85–1.15 field-strength scalar derived from frozen pre-match Elo.

9.5 / 10

All-round role contribution

All-round role contribution is the 87th role-cohort percentile from 4 disclosed metric families (100% weight coverage).

How this was calculated

weighted mean of position-specific metric percentiles; raw action rates use frozen pre-match field-strength adjustment and ratios use empirical-Bayes shrinkage

Source: API-Football embedded player-fixture statistics

Evidence: 46 observations · 100% coverage

duels won per 90

7.379

duel success

0.462

successful dribbles per 90

2.6

fouls drawn per 90

2.066

API-Football opaque player ratings are excluded.

Rates and totals are compared only within the same position.

Positive actions receive a disclosed 0.85–1.15 field-strength scalar derived from frozen pre-match Elo.

7.0 / 8

Efficiency & execution

Efficiency & execution is the 67th role-cohort percentile from 4 disclosed metric families (100% weight coverage).

How this was calculated

weighted mean of position-specific metric percentiles; raw action rates use frozen pre-match field-strength adjustment and ratios use empirical-Bayes shrinkage

Source: API-Football embedded player-fixture statistics

Evidence: 46 observations · 100% coverage

non-penalty conversion

0.171

shot accuracy

0.56

dribble success

0.439

pass completion

0.862

API-Football opaque player ratings are excluded.

Rates and totals are compared only within the same position.

Positive actions receive a disclosed 0.85–1.15 field-strength scalar derived from frozen pre-match Elo.

4.7 / 7

Availability & consistency

Availability combines 2711 minutes (49% of team opportunity), 46 appearances, and 61% smooth consistency credit.

How this was calculated

60% minutes share + 15% appearance share + 10% start share + 15% smooth 30+ minute match-impact consistency

Source: API-Football fixture participation and team schedules

Evidence: 46 observations · 100% coverage

minutes

2711 minutes

minutes share

0.491

appearance share

0.754

consistency share

0.615

Opportunity is calculated within each represented team-season-competition.

Consistency uses unshrunk match impact and a smooth 0.40–0.60 credit curve instead of a noisy hard threshold.

2.7 / 5

Individual accolades

No qualifying individual accolade is recorded for this player in the audited official-source snapshot; 0.0 of 10.0.

How this was calculated

published direct award points; sum within competition tier, apply the tier cap, sum tiers, then apply the 10-point component cap

Source: Official FIFA, confederation, UEFA, league, and players-union award records

Evidence: 0 observations · 100% coverage

Uncapped direct points: 0.00.

Tier credits after overlap caps: none.

Final accolade component: 0.00/10.0.

An absent official award is scored as zero; the LLM cannot add or alter honors.

0.0 / 10

Strong-opposition performance

Against opponents at or above the 75th pre-match Elo percentile: 21 appearances, 1393 minutes, and 52nd role-impact percentile.

How this was calculated

85% minutes-weighted role impact + 15% capped 900-minute volume

Source: API-Football player-fixture statistics plus NinetyIQ leak-free pre-match Elo

Evidence: 21 observations · 100% coverage

strong-opposition matches

21

minutes

1393 minutes

mean role impact

0.524

Opponent strength is frozen before kickoff.

API-Football opaque player ratings are excluded.

3.0 / 5

Knockout & final impact

Knockout credit combines 6.43 event-leverage units from 8 goal/assist/penalty events with 14 appearances and 819 minutes.

How this was calculated

70% stage- and prestige-weighted event leverage + 25% stage-, prestige-, and minutes-weighted role impact + 5% capped 900-minute prestige volume

Source: API-Football event timelines and player-fixture statistics plus NinetyIQ leak-free pre-match Elo

Evidence: 14 observations · 100% coverage

knockout matches

14

minutes

819 minutes

knockout event leverage

6.427

mean role impact

0.54

Knockout minutes contribute only 5% of this signal.

Event leverage is adjusted for score state, match clock, knockout stage, competition prestige, and opponent strength.

API-Football opaque player ratings are excluded.

7.0 / 8

Match-swinging contribution

Match-state events produce 10.94 leverage units from 23 goal/assist/penalty events; the score uses verified event leverage without a generalized role-output proxy.

How this was calculated

100% expected-points-added goal/assist leverage (65% volume, 35% rate); generalized role output receives no match-swing credit

Source: API-Football event timelines and player-fixture statistics

Evidence: 23 observations · 100% coverage

event leverage

10.944

score-changing event actions

23

Goal leverage is the change in expected points from frozen pre-match Elo, live score, and match clock.

Untimed generalized role actions are excluded from this component.

11.5 / 12

Team performance & achievements

Team credit: UEFA Champions League winner (1.05 credit); Ligue 1 winner (0.46 credit); FIFA World Cup semi final (0.37 credit). Diminishing-return evidence is 1.44 against the disclosed 2.00 ceiling.

How this was calculated

finish × prestige × route × participation × importance; credits then receive 1.0/0.6/0.3/0.1 diminishing weights

Source: API-Football standings, tournament results, player minutes, role impact, and pre-match Elo

Evidence: 4 observations · 100% coverage

UEFA Champions League

1.052

Ligue 1

0.464

FIFA World Cup

0.371

Evidence is normalized to a 2.00 ceiling.

Team success is not awarded equally to every squad member.

Starting semi-finals and finals increases importance; bench status therefore reduces trophy credit.

14.4 / 20